
USC Chernobyl
Research Initiative
Program Directors:
Timothy A. Mousseau Anders
Pape Møller
Professor of Biological Sciences CNRS
Associate Dean for Research Université Pierre et Marie Curie
College of Arts and Sciences Paris, France
803-777-1934; 803-777-8047 +
33 1 44 27 25 94
cell: 803-920-7704 amoller@snv.jussieu.fr
mousseau@sc.edu
Program Coordinator
in Ukraine
Dr. Gennadi
Milinevsky
National Taras Shevchenko
University of Kyiv
Kyiv, Ukraine
Tel: +38 044 5264457,
Mob: +38 050 3525498
Fax: +38 044 5264507
E-mail: genmilinevsky@gmail.com
E-mail: gmilin@univ.kiev.ua
Photos related to USC's Chernobyl activities - http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/photos-chernobyl.htm
Since 1998 USC has actively sponsored research related to
the long term ecological and health consequences of the low level radiation
that was dispersed over vast expanses of Europe.
Investigators at USC have obtained funding from a variety of extramural sources
including NSF, National Geographic, CRDF, and other private foundations and
have published several seminal papers concerning the impacts of low level
radioactive contaminants on ecological systems. This research is important for
the understanding of long term consequences of radiation for ecosystem and
human health and will be instrumental in predicting the environmental
half-lives of these contaminants. This research is of significance for hazard
assessment related to industrial, military or terrorist nuclear incidents.
Summary of principal findings to date that are published, in
press or submitted (see attached list for citations):
1) Surveys
of bird populations indicate that mutation loads in natural populations are
much higher than in uncontaminated areas.
2) Literature
reviews indicate that mutation rates in many different species of plants and
animals (including humans) are higher than in control regions.
3) Chernobyl populations
exhibit a wide variety of morphological deformities that are not found in any
normal population.
4) Surveys
of birds, insects, and spiders indicate that many species are either absent or
in very low numbers in the Chernobyl
region. Brightly colored and migratory species of birds appear to be
particularly sensitive to radioactive contaminants.
5) Studies
of birds indicate that some species may only persist in the contaminated
regions via immigration from uncontaminated areas. Without this immigration,
perceived impacts would be even higher than current projections. Media reports
of a “healthy” Chernobyl environment with rare species of birds and mammals are
likely the result of immigrants and not locally sustained populations.
6) Population
and community studies suggest that antioxidants (e.g. vitamins A and E, and carotenoids) may provide protection against the mutagenic
effects of radioactive contaminants.
Priorities for future studies
Funding is currently being sought for research in the
following area:
1)
Chernobyl Ecosystem Studies
USC now has a well established, internationally
recognized track record of basic ecological and environmental studies of Chernobyl, with seven
years of baseline data for several species. Funding is needed to continue our
monitoring of primary study populations and expand our coverage to include
additional affected populations in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. Our goals are
to rigorously assess population and community dynamics for birds, insects and
plants with the ultimate aim of predicting ecosystem recovery times following
nuclear incidents. In addition, we are
developing methods for rapid assessment of environmental impacts on DNA,
populations and communities that will be invaluable for monitoring following
other incidents. Preliminary data indicate that the Chernobyl ecosystem is
presently improving and continued monitoring is essential for the development
management plans related to nuclear incidents in the future.
.
Publications from USC
Chernobyl Research:
1) Anecdotes and Empirical Research in Chernobyl: Reply to
Jim Smith. It has been suggested that health and environmental effects related
to Chernobyl
are much less than expected. Unfortunately, so few studies have been conducted
and published that it is too early to state with any confidence what the larger
scale and longer term consequences of low dose radiation might be. Of more
concern are the claims that Chernobyl
is a thriving ecosystem with many rare species returning to the zone. These
reports are largely unfounded or based on unscientific anecdotal observations. Our
studies, though limited, strongly suggest that there may be much larger effects
than predicted.
A.P. Moller, T.A. Mousseau, F. de Lope & N. Saino. 2007.
Anecdotes and empirical research in Chernobyl. Biology Letters of the Royal
Society, in press.
2) Species Richness and Abundance of Forest
Birds in Relation to Radiation at Chernobyl.
This paper reports on a community analysis of species richness and total
abundance in relation to background radiation levels in the Chernobyl
region of Ukraine.
This may be the first
systematic analysis of community level effects ever reported. The
principle findings were that species richness declined by over 50% with
increasing contamination levels, with species feeding. Total abundance of birds
decreased by about 66% between the most contaminated sites and site with
typical (control) background radiation levels. Interestingly, birds that
typically feed on terrestrial insects were most likely to show reduced numbers
or be absent from the most contaminated areas.
A.P.
Moller, T.A. Mousseau. 2007. Species richness and abundance of forest birds in
relation to radiation at Chernobyl. Biology Letters of the Royal Society 3: 483-486.
3) Determinants of Interspecific
Variation in Population Declines of Birds after Exposure to Radiation at Chernobyl. This paper
reports on a community analysis of bird species that appear to experience
disproportionately higher population depression in response to radioactive contaminants
in the Chernobyl
zone. The main findings are that brightly colored and migratory bird species are most
likely to be absent or in low numbers in the more contaminated regions of the
Chernobyl Zone. This is perhaps the first rigorous analysis of community level
consequences of radioactive contaminants.
A.P.
Moller, T.A Mousseau. 2007. Determinants of Interspecific
Variation in Population Declines of Birds after Exposure to Radiation at
Chernobyl. Journal of Applied Ecology,
in press.
4) Elevated Frequency of Abnormalities in Barn
Swallows from Chernobyl: This paper reports on the numbers and
diversity of morphological abnormalities found in Chernobyl
populations of barn swallow when compared to control populations in Ukraine, Italy,
Spain and Denmark. This is possibly the first
comprehensive survey of abnormalities in natural populations and suggests that
the elevated mutation rates seen in Chernobyl populations are generating
significant numbers of morphological defects.
A.P. Moller, T.A. Mousseau, F. de Lope, and N. Saino. 2007.
Elevated frequency of abnormalities in barn swallows from Chernobyl. Biology Letters of the
Royal Society.
5) Children from Chernobyl Show Depressed
Numbers of Red Blood Cells, Leukocytes and Platelets: This paper explores a
unique dataset of children born and living in the Narodichesky
region of Ukraine, a region that is moderately contaminated. This is the first
comprehensive analysis of this unique group of children and this paper
represents the first of a series that investigate many non-cancer morbidities
observed in this population.
E. Stepanova, W. Karmaus, M. Naboka, V. Vdovenko, T.A. Mousseau, V.M. Shestopalov, W. Drane, J. Vena, D. Underhill, and H. Pastides. Radioactive exposure
from the Chernobyl accident had an adverse effect on red blood cells,
leukocyte, and platelets in children in the Narodichesky
region, Ukraine – a prospective study. Submitted 2007.
6) Birds Prefer to Breed in Sites With Low
Radioactivity in Chernobyl.
This paper describes experiments designed to examine nest site choice in two
species of birds inhabiting the highly contaminated Red Forest
near the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant.
A.P.
Moller, T.A Mousseau .
2007. Birds prefer to breed in sites with low radioactivity in
Chernobyl. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 274:1443-1448.
Photo of nest
box locations in the Red Forest of Chernobyl.
7) Objections to the Chernobyl
Forum Report: The official UN Chernobyl Forum report significantly
underestimated the likely deaths from cancers in human populations of Europe. The UN predicts 4000 deaths, but reanalysis of
the same data indicates that death rates will certainly exceed 9000, with
30,000 – 60,000 very likely. Mousseau et al. (2005) were the first to voice
their objections to the Chernobyl Forum Report.
Mousseau, T.A., N. Nelson, & V. Shestopalov.
2005. Don’t underestimate the death rate from Chernobyl. NATURE 437:
1089.
And,
for related information, see The Other Report
on Chernobyl (TORCH).
8) Review of Genetic Damage to Many Species: Mousseau
and Moller’s reviews of other research have found
more than 20 species that show genetic damage as a consequence of Chernobyl contaminants.
This is the first systematic review of the genetic consequences of low dose
radiation in a natural environment and suggests that such damage may be
extensive.
A.P.
Møller, T. A. Mousseau. 2006. Biological consequences
of Chernobyl: 20 years after the
disaster. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21:200-207.
9)
Survival and
Reproduction are Dramatically Reduced in Chernobyl Swallows: Because barn swallows return to the same nest
year after year it is possible to track individual survival. And, since these birds make their nests
inside barns, it is possible to examine individual reproductive rates and
offspring survival. We have found that
survival rates close the reactor in the most contaminated sites are close to
zero. In areas of moderate
contamination, annual survival is less than 15- 25% (versus about 40% in
control populations from Ukraine, Spain, Italy and Denmark). Chernobyl
populations also show dramatically reduced reproductive rates and lower
offspring survival. This is perhaps the only published study that attempts to
address questions of reproduction and survival for any species in the Chernobyl
Zone. There has been virtually no other research of this type, probably due to
the lack of funding for this sort of research.
A.P. Møller, T. A. Mousseau, G.
Milinevsky, A. Peklo, E. Pysanets and T. Szép.
2005. Condition, reproduction and survival of barn
swallows from Chernobyl.
Journal of Animal Ecology, 74: 1102-1111.
10) Stable Isotope Analyses Indicate Chernobyl Populations are Sinks: Using high tech geochemical approaches, we have
determined that the Chernobyl
barn swallow populations are only sustained via immigration from adjacent,
uncontaminated populations. Using stable
isotope analyses on current and past specimens (from museums) we have inferred
that current Chernobyl populations are composed of a more diverse group of
individuals (i.e. immigrants) than is observed in control populations or in
populations collected from the Chernobyl region prior to the disaster.
A.P. Møller, K. A. Hobson, T. A. Mousseau
and A. M. Peklo. 2006. Chernobyl as a
population sink for barn swallows: Tracking dispersal using stable isotope
profiles. Ecological Applications 16:1696-1705
11) Antioxidants,
Radiation and Mutations: Investigations of individual birds have
revealed that in areas of high contamination, antioxidants (i.e. vitamins A and
E, and carotenoids) are depressed. Depressed antioxidants appear related to
increased mutation rates (as has been found in many other species, including
humans). In Chernobyl barn swallows,
depressed antioxidants are associated with dramatically increased rates of
defects in sperm, a phenomenon linked to depressed fertility in many species.
Møller, A. P., Surai,
P., and T. A. Mousseau. 2004. Antioxidants, radiation and mutations in
barn swallows from Chernobyl. Proceedings
of the Royal Society, London, 272:247-252.
12) Mutation in Morphological Characters: It
has also been observed that the sort of characters that seem most affected by
increased mutation rates are those that may be very important to reproductive
behavior in barn swallows.
Møller, A. P.,
and T. A. Mousseau. 2003. Mutation and sexual selection: A test using
barn swallows from Chernobyl. Evolution, 57: 2139-2146.
13) Albinism in Chernobyl
Barn Swallows: Mousseau and
colleagues have investigated the consequences of elevated mutations in barn
swallow populations living in the contaminated regions of Ukraine. The principle findings are that there are
many visible mutations observed, including dramatically increased rates of
partial albinos. The expression of this
mutation, which is analogous to vitiligo in humans,
is likely related to depressed antioxidants observed in these birds.
Møller,
A. P. and T. A. Mousseau . 2001. Albinism and
phenotype of barn swallows Hirundo rustica from Chernobyl. Evolution,
55 (10): 2097-2104.
Highlights of Recent Press Coverage of
USC’s Chernobyl
Research:
1)
The New York
Times: Did Chernobyl Leave an
Eden for Wildlife? (Henry Fountain) August 28, 2007.
2)
The
Economist: Plumes and Plumage: Sexual selection and Chernobyl (12 July 2007).
3)
Science
News: Chernobyl
Hits Birds Hard (Krista Zala), 12 July 2007.
4)
News @
Nature: Chernobyl
birds are better off drab and lazy (Louis
Buckley), 11 July 2007:
5) Cosmos: Colourful birds
hardest hit at Chernobyl (July 13, 2007)(Liz
Williams)
6) Los Angeles Times: For
Chernobyl birds, color is a curse (Amber
Dance), July 14, 2007:
7) UPI: Radiation
affects brightly colored birds (July 11, 2007):
8) The
Science Daily: Brightly Colored Birds
Most Affected By Chernobyl
Radiation. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070711105732.htm
9) Reuters:
Dull birds fared better after Chernobyl: study.(Michael
Kahn): http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSL1076096720070711
10) Yahoo: Migratory
birds more susceptible to Chernobyl like radiation, says study. (ANI): http://in.news.yahoo.com/070711/139/6hx4f.html
11) The Guardian: Brighter
birds more at risk from Chernobyl fallout. (Ian Sample), 11 July 2007: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,2123409,00.html
12) Dziennik (Poland): Ptaki nie śpiewają w Czarnobylu. http://www.dziennik.pl/Default.aspx?TabId=255&ShowArticleId=52218
13) Live Science: Nuclear
Accidents Kill Brightly Colored Birds Most. http://www.livescience.com/animals/070711_birds_radiation.html
14) Speigel: Roten und gelben Vögeln schadet Radioaktivität am moisten. http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/0,1518,493623,00.html
15)
Villaggio Globale. Le radiazioni nucleari colpiscono di più
gli uccelli colorati. (12 July 2007). http://www.vglobale.it/NewsRoom/index.php?News=3436
16) Science a GoGo: Chernobyl Radiation Affecting The Brightest Of The Bunch. http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20070610224537data_trunc_sys.shtml
17) Birdwatch Magazine: Chernobyl radiation affects brightly coloured birds most. (12 July 2007): http://birdwatchmagazine.blogspot.com/2007/07/chernobyl-radiations-affects-brightly.html
18) China
View: Study: Brightly colored birds most
affected by Chernobyl
radiation. (July 12, 2007)(Sun Yunlong). http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-07/12/content_6364049.htm
19) Times Online: Survival of the Dullest at Chernobyl.
(Mark Henderson)(July 11, 2007). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2056303.ece
20) USC News: University
researcher: Brightly colored birds affected most by Chernobyl disaster (July 13, 2007). http://uscnews.sc.edu/ASCI_BIOL197.html
21) The Associate Press: Chernobyl Area Becomes Wildlife Haven. (Douglas
Birch), 7 June 2007. This piece by
Douglas Birch, AP Moscow Bureau Chief, was republished by more than 70
newspapers worldwide.. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/07/AR2007060701315_pf.html.
22) Suite101: Chernobyl Birds Endure
Radiation. (Rosemary Drisdelle)(May 11, 2007): http://birds.suite101.com/article.cfm/chernobyl_birds_endure_radiation
23) The
National Geographic: Chernobyl Birds' Defects Link Radiation, Not Stress,
to Human Ailments. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/04/070418-chernobyl-birds.html
24) Nuclear Monitor: Chernobyl Disease: Stress or Radiation? (WISE
May3, 2007). http://www.nirs.org/mononline/nm655.pdf
25) The New Scientist: Chernobyl alert over birth defects: http://www.newscientist.com/channel/health/mg19426003.900-chernobyl-alert-over-birth-defects.html
26) The CBC's "As It
Happens" show (April 3, 2007): http://www.cbc.ca/radioshows/AS_IT_HAPPENS/20070403.shtml
Click here for an mp3 of this
interview: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/cbc-as-it-happens-mousseau-chernobyl.mp3
27) The New
Scientist (March 28, 2007): http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11473-chernobylbased-birds-avoid-radioactive-nests.html
28) Mongabat.com:
Chernobyl birds prefer to breed in sites with low
radioactivity. (April 3, 2007)(Rhett A, Butler). http://news.mongabay.com/2007/0403-chernobyl.html
29) The State
Newspaper: Smart Birds Might Teach Lesson.
http://www.thestate.com/123/story/30771.html
30) The CBC’s
Quirk’s and Quarks show: http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/archives/05-06/apr29.html
31) The BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4923220.stm
32) The New
Scientist: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/new-scientist.htm
33) The
International Edition of the Readers Digest: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/ReadersDigest.pdf
34) Discover
Magazine: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/discover-chernobyl3.jpg
35) National
Public Radio - Living on Earth: http://www.loe.org/shows/segments.htm?programID=06-P13-00016&segmentID=2
36) USC Press Release: http://uscnews.sc.edu/asci-biol096.html
37) The State
Newspaper April 26th: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/papers/TheState-apr26-06.pdf
or http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/14429236.htm
38) The
National Geographic: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0426_060426_chernobyl.html
39) The Sivacracy Blog:
http://www.nyu.edu/classes/siva/archives/003036.html
40) TBO News: http://www.tbo.com/news/scitech/MGBFZB9XDME.html
41) The Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/main.jhtml?xml=/health/2006/04/24/wnuke24.xml
42) The New Zealand Herald: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=2&ObjectID=10376225
43) The National: http://www.thenational.com.pg/042706/column6.htm
Photos
by Mousseau and Moller in and around Chernobyl:
For hi rez: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/photos2/Chernobyl_photos/
For Lo-res: http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/photos/
http://cricket.biol.sc.edu/chernobyl/photos-chernobyl.htm
Our Funding Sources:
The US National Science Foundation
(NSF)
The National Geographic Society
(NGS)
The US Civilian Research Development
Foundation (CRDF)
The French Centre National de la Recerche Scientifique (CNRS)
The University of South
Carolina Environmental Research Initiatives
Committee (ERIC)
The USC School of the Environment (Dr. Bruce Coull)
The Samuel Freeman Charitable
Trust (Bill Murray)
The Fulbright Program
Our Collaborators:
Anders Møller,
CNRS, Paris, France
Gennadi
Milinevksy, Taras Shevchenko
University, Kiev
Alexander
Peklo, Ukrainian Museum of Natural History,
Kiev
Sergey Gaschak, I R L, Slavutych, Ukraine
Eugeny
Pysanets, Ukrainian Museum
of Natural History, Kiev
Nicola Saino, University of Milano
Florentino
de Lope, University of Extramadura, Spain
Wilfried Karmaus, University
of South Carolina
Peter Surai,
Scottish Agricultural College, UK
Dan Zuroski,
USC, South Carolina, USA
Keith Hobson, Saskatoon, Canada
Tibor Szép , Hungary
Travis Glenn, Savannah
River Ecology Lab, USA
Marina Naboka, NAS, Ukraine
V. Shestopalov,
NAS, Ukraine
Neal Nelson, US
EPA
Cole Matson, Duke University
John Bickham, Texas A&M
Mike Wyatt, USC
Mark Haussmann, & Carol
Vleck, Iowa State
Gier
Rudolfsen, University of Tromso, Norway
E. Stepanova, Ukraine
M. Bondarkov, Ukraine
I. Iryna
Kozeretska, Ukraine
V. Bezrukov, Ukraine
Igor Chizhevsky, Ukraine
Andriy Maksimenko, Ukraine
Valentyn Martyenko, Ukraine
Wilfried Karmaus, USC
Bruce Coull, USC &
Center for Humans and Nature